Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.7 MaxQwen | Solar Pro 4Upstage |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #13 of 44$0.057 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.475Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.090Upstage ↗ · Sep 18, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $4.425Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.36Upstage ↗ · Sep 18, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 524K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 18, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Upstage |
| Family | Qwen3 7 | Solar Pro |
| Model | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Pro 4 |
| Version | Qwen3.7 Max | Solar Pro 4 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-05-20 | 2026-08-14 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 524K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Upstage (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
| Supported languages | Unknown | English, Korean, Japanese |
| Training data cutoff | Unknown | February 2026 |
Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities
Solar Pro 4 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.7 Max vs Solar Pro 4 FAQs
Is Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.090 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 and Solar Pro 4 is $0.36 per million tokens, so Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
Qwen3.7 Max has the larger sourced context window. Qwen3.7 Max supports 1,000K and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4 be self-hosted?+
Solar Pro 4 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight; Solar Pro 4 is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 understand images?+
Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input; Solar Pro 4 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
Solar Pro 4 has the larger sourced maximum output: Qwen3.7 Max supports 66K and Solar Pro 4 supports 131K output tokens.
Do Qwen3.7 Max and Solar Pro 4 support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Solar Pro 4: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
Qwen3.7 Max has 4 sourced provider routes; Solar Pro 4 has 1, so Qwen3.7 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Max or Solar Pro 4?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.