Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingKimi-K3Qwen3.7 Max
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#11 of 2271.3 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case#12 of 36$0.057 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#13 of 2251.7 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkKimi-K3Qwen3.7 Max
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader81.02100% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case77.5096% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader88.19100% of row best · points · Kimi K3 · 15,023 output tokens / case81.2692% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (default) · 8,636 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.7 MaxVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldKimi-K3Qwen3.7 Max
DeveloperMoonshot AIQwen
FamilyKimi K3Qwen3 7
ModelKimi-K3Qwen3.7 Max
VersionKimi-K3Qwen3.7 Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-162026-05-20
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters2.8TUnknown
Active parameters104BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.475
Output price$4.425
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-max

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsembedding, image, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7 Max FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Kimi K3 is $2.85 and Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K3 is $14.25 and Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K3 supports 1,049K and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Kimi K3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max be self-hosted?+

Kimi K3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Kimi K3 is open weight; Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and Qwen3.7 Max is 66K.

Do Kimi K3 and Qwen3.7 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.7 Max has 4, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or Qwen3.7 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback