Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic |  Qwen3.7 MaxQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | #2 of 5799.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #27 of 27$0.824 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | #14 of 2749.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $10.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $1.475Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $50.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $4.425Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 86.82100% of row best · percent · claude-fable-5-1-max-effort · 16,470 output tokens / case | 77.5089% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 84.53100% of row best · points · Claude Fable 5.1 (max effort) · 68,653 output tokens / case | 72.5786% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (high) · 9,019 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Family | Claude 5 1 | Qwen3 7 |
| Model | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Version | Claude Fable 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-05-20 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Claude Fable 5.1 Capabilities
Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Mythos 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 and Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5.1 is $50.00 and Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,000,000 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Fable 5.1 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max understand images?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is documented with image input; Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5.1 supports 128,000 tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 65,536 tokens.
Do Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
Claude Fable 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; Qwen3.7 Max has 4, so Qwen3.7 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.