Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max
At a Glance
| Compare | Qwen3.7 MaxQwen | Qwen3.8 MaxQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #7 of 5783.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 55.6–88.9 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #16 of 27$0.107 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9 | UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort | #6 of 2758.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 44.7–61.3 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.475Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $1.65Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $4.425Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 | $4.951Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader | 77.5095% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case | 81.88100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified | 72.5794% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (high) · 9,019 output tokens / case | 76.83100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Max (thinking on) · 29,839 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Qwen | Qwen |
| Family | Qwen3 7 | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Qwen3.7 Max | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-05-20 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Both models have the same sourced context window: 1,000,000 tokens each.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.7 Max supports 65,536 tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131,072 tokens.
Do Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.7 Max has 4 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, a tie.
Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.