Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#13 of 44$0.057 per LiveBench case#4 of 44$0.021 per LiveBench case
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.475Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.113Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$4.425Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.382Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8-Flash
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-3.6396% of row best · score · Qwen3.7 Max; 95% CI [-4.47002493, -2.78058186]; sessions 38392; observations 1816729; rank 34-0.07100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Flash Next; 95% CI [-0.83684609, 0.68718675]; sessions 57458; observations 7278343; rank 26
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader77.5098% of row best · percent · qwen3.7-max · 12,909 output tokens / case79.12100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-flash-next · 54,438 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified81.2698% of row best · points · Qwen3.7 Max (default) · 8,636 output tokens / case83.20100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Flash · 24,187 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8-Flash
DeveloperQwenQwen
FamilyQwen3 7Qwen3 8 Flash
ModelQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8-Flash
VersionQwen3.7 MaxQwen3.8-Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-20Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, visionagents, chat, computer-use, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Qwen3.7 Max Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.7-max

Qwen3.8 Flash Capabilities

agentschatcomputer-usereasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.7 Max vs Qwen3.8 Flash FAQs

Is Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

Qwen3.7 Max is $1.475 and Qwen3.8 Flash is $0.113 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.7 Max is $4.425 and Qwen3.8 Flash is $0.382 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Qwen3.7 Max is 1,000K and Qwen3.8 Flash is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

Qwen3.8 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Qwen3.7 Max is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Flash is not marked open weight.

Can Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Flash understand images?+

Qwen3.7 Max is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

Qwen3.8 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: Qwen3.7 Max supports 66K and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 131K output tokens.

Do Qwen3.7 Max and Qwen3.8 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.7 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

Qwen3.7 Max has 4 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Flash has 4, a tie.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.7 Max or Qwen3.8 Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback