Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,480.17100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1475.34892554, 1484.99642998]; votes 27615; rank 151,449.9498% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,294.16100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1286.17018729, 1302.15601223]; votes 8447; rank 211,259.5597% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperMetaxAI
FamilyMuse SparkGrok 4 20
ModelMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionMuse Spark 1.1Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecyclepreviewpreview
Released2026-07-09Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessUnknownXai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Only Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.1 is 1,000K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.1 is — and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.1 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Muse Spark 1.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.1 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback