Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,420.5898% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 1041,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,222.0597% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 711,259.55100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperMistral AIxAI
FamilyMistral Medium 3 5 128bGrok 4 20
ModelMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleactivepreview
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters127.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownXai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsgeneration, reasoning, research, tools

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Only Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback