Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs GPT-6 Astra

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#6 of 4684.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#41 of 44$0.520 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#27 of 3849.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$10.00Openai · Sep 4, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$50.00Openai · Sep 4, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,050K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 4, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-10.8880% of row best · score · Mistral Medium 3.5; 95% CI [-12.33636331, -9.41760729]; sessions 10244; observations 358935; rank 4311.54100% of row best · score · GPT 6 Astra (Max); 95% CI [9.43393746, 13.63932109]; sessions 10372; observations 782334; rank 2
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,420.5898% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 1041,443.72100% of row best · rating · gpt-6-astra-max; 95% CI [1432.08094427, 1455.36783662]; votes 2693; rank 59
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,222.0596% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 711,278.58100% of row best · rating · gpt-6-astra-max; 95% CI [1261.64778832, 1295.50325714]; votes 1367; rank 30
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner3 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-6 Astra
DeveloperMistral AIOpenAI
FamilyMistral Medium 3 5 128bGpt 6
ModelMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-6 Astra
VersionMistral-Medium-3.5-128BGPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,050K
Total parameters127.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced input price: $10.00 per million tokens. Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced output price: $50.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and GPT-6 Astra is 128K.

Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, so GPT-6 Astra has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback