Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Qwen3.8 Max
At a Glance
| Compare | Mistral Medium 3.5 128BMistral AI | Qwen3.8 MaxQwen |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $1.65Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $4.951Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader | -10.8886% of row best · score · Mistral Medium 3.5; 95% CI [-12.33636331, -9.41760729]; sessions 10244; observations 358935; rank 43 | 3.30100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [2.46604139, 4.14181105]; sessions 31489; observations 2502655; rank 17 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,420.5896% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104 | 1,480.55100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1474.79040793, 1486.31846927]; votes 16670; rank 14 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,222.0593% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 71 | 1,315.33100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1307.40892164, 1323.25970514]; votes 8665; rank 6 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 3 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral AI | Qwen |
| Family | Mistral Medium 3 5 128b | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 127.7B | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.
Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.