Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Qwen3.8 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#10 of 4679.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 52.8–86.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#23 of 44$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#6 of 3863.2 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 50.0–66.7
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.65Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.951Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMistral-Medium-3.5-128BQwen3.8-Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-09-15-d25aabda0010 · outcome_score · leader-10.8886% of row best · score · Mistral Medium 3.5; 95% CI [-12.33636331, -9.41760729]; sessions 10244; observations 358935; rank 433.30100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [2.46604139, 4.14181105]; sessions 31489; observations 2502655; rank 17
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,420.5896% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 1041,480.55100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1474.79040793, 1486.31846927]; votes 16670; rank 14
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,222.0593% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 711,315.33100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1307.40892164, 1323.25970514]; votes 8665; rank 6
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner3 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMistral-Medium-3.5-128BQwen3.8-Max
DeveloperMistral AIQwen
FamilyMistral Medium 3 5 128bQwen3 8 Max
ModelMistral-Medium-3.5-128BQwen3.8-Max
VersionMistral-Medium-3.5-128BQwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters127.7B2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownAlibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B supports 262K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.

Do Mistral Medium 3.5 128B and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Medium 3.5 128B or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback