Mistral Large 3 vs Kimi K2.5

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMistral Large 3Kimi-K2.5
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,427.6299% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.57601414, 1430.66670291]; votes 65336; rank 851,445.75100% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.5-thinking; 95% CI [1442.41231565, 1449.09515875]; votes 70620; rank 50
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,226.8497% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1216.90651393, 1236.78308197]; votes 4751; rank 661,266.74100% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.5-thinking; 95% CI [1260.83834046, 1272.64651923]; votes 26728; rank 36
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Mistral AI · activeMistral Large 3Verified Aug 29, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K2.5Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldMistral Large 3Kimi-K2.5
DeveloperMistral AIMoonshot AI
FamilyMistral Large 3Kimi K2 5
ModelMistral Large 3Kimi-K2.5
VersionMistral Large 3Kimi-K2.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-022026-01-27
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters675B1T
Active parameters41B32B
LicenseApache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessMistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, tools

17 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.50
Output price$1.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Kimi K2.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.45
Output price$2.25
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.5

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Large 3 vs Kimi K2.5 FAQs

Is Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Large 3 and Kimi K2.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 and Kimi K2.5 is $0.45 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.5 is cheaper on this metric. Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 and Kimi K2.5 is $2.25 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Mistral Large 3 is 262K and Kimi K2.5 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Mistral Large 3 is open weight; Kimi K2.5 is open weight.

Can Mistral Large 3 and Kimi K2.5 understand images?+

Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input; Kimi K2.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Large 3 is — and Kimi K2.5 is —.

Do Mistral Large 3 and Kimi K2.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Kimi K2.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

Mistral Large 3 has 2 sourced provider routes; Kimi K2.5 has 3, so Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Large 3 or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback