Mistral Large 3 vs GLM 5.3

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingMistral Large 3GLM-5.3
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#28 of 36$0.248 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkMistral Large 3GLM-5.3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,427.6297% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.57601414, 1430.66670291]; votes 65336; rank 851,474.49100% of row best · rating · glm-5.3-max; 95% CI [1467.12172899, 1481.86064533]; votes 7401; rank 18
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Mistral AI · activeMistral Large 3Verified Aug 29, 2026
Z.ai · activeGLM 5.3Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldMistral Large 3GLM-5.3
DeveloperMistral AIZ.ai
FamilyMistral Large 3Glm 5 3
ModelMistral Large 3GLM-5.3
VersionMistral Large 3GLM-5.3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-02Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,000K
Total parameters675BUnknown
Active parameters41BUnknown
LicenseApache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessMistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, visionagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.50
Output price$1.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

GLM 5.3 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.20
Output price$4.00
Serving providers4
Canonical IDzai-org/glm-5.3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Mistral Large 3 vs GLM 5.3 FAQs

Is Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Large 3 and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 and GLM 5.3 is $1.20 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric. Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 and GLM 5.3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

GLM 5.3 has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Large 3 supports 262K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+

Mistral Large 3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Large 3 is open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.

Can Mistral Large 3 and GLM 5.3 understand images?+

Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Large 3 is — and GLM 5.3 is 131K.

Do Mistral Large 3 and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

Mistral Large 3 has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so GLM 5.3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Mistral Large 3 or GLM 5.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback