Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct vs Mistral Large 3

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,287.1390% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.87677682, 1291.39199009]; votes 39349; rank 2431,427.62100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.57601414, 1430.66670291]; votes 65336; rank 85
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,141.4793% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.42029588, 1150.51619722]; votes 6936; rank 1021,226.84100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1216.90651393, 1236.78308197]; votes 4751; rank 66
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
Meta · activeLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructVerified Aug 28, 2026
Mistral AI · activeMistral Large 3Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 4 Maverick 17b 128e InstructMistral Large 3
ModelLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
VersionLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-052025-12-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000,000262,144
Total parameters401,583,781,376675,000,000,000
Active parameters17,000,000,00041,000,000,000
LicenseotherApache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

16 comparable fields · 12 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price$0.20
Output price$0.696
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.50
Output price$1.50
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs

Is Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is $0.20 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 per million tokens, so Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is $0.696 and Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 per million tokens, so Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct supports 1,000,000 and Mistral Large 3 supports 262,144.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.

Can Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct is — and Mistral Large 3 is —.

Do Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Mistral Large 3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback