Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3

At a Glance

Compare
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7#28 of 5743.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 14.3–81.0
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.1875Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$0.25Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.6525Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$0.75Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,287.1990% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.93484207, 1291.44351277]; votes 39450; rank 2611,428.16100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1425.33671505, 1430.99053174]; votes 84205; rank 98
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-10-09-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,141.6394% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.58229133, 1150.67926500]; votes 6922; rank 1201,220.76100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1212.81813492, 1228.69335345]; votes 8643; rank 83
ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified69.93100% of row best · points · Llama 4 Maverick (no thinking) · 2,232 output tokens / case61.7888% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 (no thinking) · 2,031 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 4 Maverick 17b 128e InstructMistral Large 3
ModelLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
VersionLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-InstructMistral Large 3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-052025-12-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K262K
Total parameters401.6B675B
Active parameters17B41B
LicenseotherApache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessOpenrouter (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs

Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.1875 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.25 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.6525 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.75 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000,000 tokens and Mistral Large 3 supports 262,144 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.

Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Mistral Large 3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback