Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,427.6296% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.57601414, 1430.66670291]; votes 65336; rank 85 | 1,479.56100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1473.34740586, 1485.77213629]; votes 13136; rank 12 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,226.8493% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1216.90651393, 1236.78308197]; votes 4751; rank 66 | 1,312.86100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1304.57707433, 1321.13715544]; votes 7244; rank 6 |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 70.3987% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 · 2,056 output tokens / case | 81.06100% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Max · 23,334 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral AI | Qwen |
| Family | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Mistral Large 3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Document | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 675B | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | 41B | Unknown |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Mistral Large 3 Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
 Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Mistral Large 3 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Mistral Large 3 is $0.50 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric. Mistral Large 3 is $1.50 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced context window. Mistral Large 3 supports 262K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Qwen3.8 Max leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Mistral Large 3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Mistral Large 3 is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Mistral Large 3 is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.
Do Mistral Large 3 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Mistral Large 3 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Mistral Large 3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.