GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-5.2OpenAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #33 of 4649.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete | #22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #28 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #34 of 3844.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $14.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 400K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 86.1796% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 52.9181% of row best · percent · GPT-5.2 (XHigh) | 65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,172.1497% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2-search-non-reasoning; 95% CI [1166.59081201, 1177.68538907]; votes 75658; rank 20 | 1,204.11100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1198.80874858, 1209.41102574]; votes 109553; rank 13 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,412.4397% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1409.21136225, 1415.65317114]; votes 78967; rank 125 | 1,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,229.4498% of row best · rating · gpt-5.2; 95% CI [1223.25930119, 1235.62760198]; votes 18997; rank 68 | 1,259.55100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1253.19837141, 1265.89693020]; votes 22925; rank 46 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 5 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | xAI |
| Family | Gpt 5 2 | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | GPT-5.2 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-08-31 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 400K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
GPT-5.2 Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-5.2OpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-5.2OpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-5.2 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs
Is GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
GPT-5.2 is $1.75 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.2 is $14.00 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.2 supports 400K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 5 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+
GPT-5.2 is documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-5.2 is 128K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.
Do GPT-5.2 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
GPT-5.2 has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so GPT-5.2 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GPT-5.2 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.