DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.2
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek |  GPT-5.2OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #33 of 4649.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #5 of 44$0.022 per LiveBench case | #28 of 44$0.161 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #34 of 3844.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.15DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 10, 2026 | $1.75Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.60Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | $14.00Openai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 400K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 10, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 83.20100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4.1-flash-max · 36,355 output tokens / case | 79.2195% of row best · percent · gpt-5.2-2025-12-11-high · 11,512 output tokens / case |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 88.03100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max) · 18,199 output tokens / case | 78.0889% of row best · points · GPT-5.2 · 4,266 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Family | Deepseek V4 1 | Gpt 5 2 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | GPT-5.2 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash | GPT-5.2 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-10 | 2025-12-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-08-31 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 400K |
| Total parameters | 763.2B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, fim, generation, reasoning, responses, structured_outputs, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
| Architecture design | Causal Encoder-Decoder (20 encoder + 20 decoder layers) | Unknown |
| Backbone parameters | 552000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Active parameters during decode | 16000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Active parameters during prefill | 8000000000 parameters | Unknown |
| Pre-training corpus | 45000000000000 tokens | Unknown |
| Reasoning effort range | 1–100 | Unknown |
| Routed experts per MoE layer | 384 experts | Unknown |
| Routed experts per token | 6 experts | Unknown |
| Transformer layers | 40 layers | Unknown |
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Capabilities
GPT-5.2 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-5.2 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.15 and GPT-5.2 is $1.75 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is $0.60 and GPT-5.2 is $14.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 1,049K and GPT-5.2 supports 400K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is open weight; GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.2 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is documented with image input; GPT-5.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger sourced maximum output: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash supports 393K and GPT-5.2 supports 128K output tokens.
Do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GPT-5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 3 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.2 has 2, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or GPT-5.2?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.