Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hunyuan3D 2.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind |  Hunyuan3D 2.1Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #15 of 4672.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #25 of 44$0.140 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #15 of 3856.8 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $9.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Tencent |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Hunyuan3d 2 1 |
| Model | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Version | Gemini 3.5 Flash | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Image |
| Output modalities | Text | 3D |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | other |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | generation |
Gemini 3.5 Flash Capabilities
Hunyuan3D 2.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Hunyuan3D 2.1 FAQs
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Hunyuan3D 2.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $1.50 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.5 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $9.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.5 Flash is 1,049K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1 be self-hosted?+
Hunyuan3D 2.1 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.5 Flash is not marked open weight; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is open weight.
Can Gemini 3.5 Flash and Hunyuan3D 2.1 understand images?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash is documented with image input; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.5 Flash is 66K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Hunyuan3D 2.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hunyuan3D 2.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Gemini 3.5 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Hunyuan3D 2.1 has 0, so Gemini 3.5 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.