Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 3

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#15 of 4672.1 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#25 of 44$0.140 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#15 of 3856.8 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.25Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$9.00Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.75Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,475.72100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.5-flash-medium; 95% CI [1471.24691172, 1480.19960285]; votes 36627; rank 191,427.0497% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.05319044, 1430.03486299]; votes 69028; rank 91
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,307.00100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.5-flash-medium; 95% CI [1299.26365925, 1314.72946839]; votes 9618; rank 111,222.8994% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1213.86519768, 1231.90699514]; votes 6186; rank 70
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.58100% of row best · points · Gemini 3.5 Flash (high thinking) · 16,743 output tokens / case70.3993% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 · 2,056 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 3
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMistral AI
FamilyGemini 3Mistral Large 3
ModelGemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 3
VersionGemini 3.5 FlashMistral Large 3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-12-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parametersUnknown675B
Active parametersUnknown41B
LicenseUnknownApache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Gemini 3.5 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.5-flash

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.5 Flash and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash is $1.50 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.25 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.5 Flash is $9.00 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.75 per million tokens, so Mistral Large 3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1,049K and Mistral Large 3 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+

Mistral Large 3 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.5 Flash is not marked open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.

Can Gemini 3.5 Flash and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.5 Flash is 66K and Mistral Large 3 is —.

Do Gemini 3.5 Flash and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

Gemini 3.5 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.5 Flash or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback