Gemini 3.1 Pro vs o3-pro

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · previewGemini 3.1 ProVerified Aug 29, 2026
OpenAI · activeo3-proVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemini 3.1 Proo3-pro
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGemini 3O3
ModelGemini 3.1 Proo3-pro
VersionGemini 3.1 Proo3-pro
Lifecyclepreviewactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-06-10
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-06-01
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemini 3.1 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$12.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.1-pro-preview

o3-pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$20.00
Output price$80.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3-pro

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs o3-pro FAQs

Is Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.1 Pro and o3-pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro is $2.00 and o3-pro is $20.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3.1 Pro is $12.00 and o3-pro is $80.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3.1 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 1,049K and o3-pro supports 200K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3.1 Pro is not marked open weight; o3-pro is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3.1 Pro and o3-pro understand images?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro is documented with image input; o3-pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

o3-pro has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports 66K and o3-pro supports 100K output tokens.

Do Gemini 3.1 Pro and o3-pro support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. o3-pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

Gemini 3.1 Pro has 2 sourced provider routes; o3-pro has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.1 Pro or o3-pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback