DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#9 of 36$0.054 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,451.0098% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1447.00829245, 1454.98663953]; votes 54243; rank 411,479.03100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.1; 95% CI [1473.99485495, 1484.06002682]; votes 23768; rank 14
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader76.7998% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro · 35,014 output tokens / case78.57100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.1-xhigh · 13,652 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
DeepSeek · activeDeepSeek V4 ProVerified Aug 28, 2026
Meta · previewMuse Spark 1.1Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1
DeveloperDeepSeekMeta
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProMuse Spark
ModelDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1
VersionDeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-04-242026-07-09
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$0.66
Output price$1.5441
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Muse Spark 1.1 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.1

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Only DeepSeek V4 Pro has a directly sourced input price: $0.66 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Pro has a directly sourced output price: $1.5441 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Muse Spark 1.1 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; Muse Spark 1.1 is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and Muse Spark 1.1 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. Muse Spark 1.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; Muse Spark 1.1 has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback