DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#19 of 5757.9 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 38.6–72.0#6 of 5784.6 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#10 of 27$0.054 per LiveBench case#26 of 27$0.520 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9#11 of 2751.5 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.9–58.5#18 of 2746.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.66DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026$10.00Openai ↗ · Sep 4, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.5441Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026$50.00Openai ↗ · Sep 4, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,050K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 4, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-6 Astra
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · statistical tie1,451.16100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1447.27741116, 1455.03943137]; votes 57594; rank 491,442.6999% of row best · rating · gpt-6-astra-max; 95% CI [1436.40189535, 1448.98654490]; votes 12163; rank 69
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader76.7989% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro · 35,014 output tokens / case86.47100% of row best · percent · gpt-6-astra-max · 10,407 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-10-17-10-task-e9c76358afb2 · overall_score · unverified73.0789% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro (xhigh) · 17,924 output tokens / case82.32100% of row best · points · GPT-6 Astra (max) · 20,449 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIZ.aiOpenAIMiniMaxDeepSeekMistral AIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.050$0.100$0.500$1.006873798489Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (max)GPT-6.1 Sol (max)GPT-6 Astra (max)Claude Fable 5.1Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-6 Astra
DeveloperDeepSeekOpenAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 ProGpt 6
ModelDeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-6 Astra
VersionDeepSeek-V4-ProGPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-242026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,050K
Total parameters1.6TUnknown
Active parameters49BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers6
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and GPT-6 Astra is $10.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and GPT-6 Astra is $50.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,048,576 tokens and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is documented as self-hostable; GPT-6 Astra is documented as not self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has a sourced maximum output of 128,000 tokens; DeepSeek V4 Pro's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.

Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 2, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback