DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3
Market Position
LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost
This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,451.0098% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro; 95% CI [1447.00829245, 1454.98663953]; votes 54243; rank 41 | 1,474.49100% of row best · rating · glm-5.3-max; 95% CI [1467.12172899, 1481.86064533]; votes 7401; rank 18 |
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 76.7997% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-pro · 35,014 output tokens / case | 79.15100% of row best · percent · glm-5.3 · 62,090 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Glm 5 3 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GLM-5.3 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GLM-5.3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 49B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Pro Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | GLM-5.2Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.3 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is $0.66 and GLM 5.3 is $1.20 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro is $1.5441 and GLM 5.3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro supports 1,049K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
GLM 5.3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro is open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro is not documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro is — and GLM 5.3 is 131K.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro: reasoning. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro has 6 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so DeepSeek V4 Pro has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.