DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Grok 4.6
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #13 of 2267.6 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #18 of 36$0.097 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #8 of 2256.6 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader | 90.50100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Low) | 87.5097% of row best · percent · Grok 4.6 (Medium) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader | 61.2591% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | 67.08100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.6 (XHigh) |
| ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader | 84.0497% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · 18,922 output tokens / case | 86.61100% of row best · points · Grok 4.6 · 15,575 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark win | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Pro | Grok 4 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Grok 4.6 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | Grok 4.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-08-13 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2026-02-01 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 500K |
| Total parameters | 1.6T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 49B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
13 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Grok 4.6 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813DeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Grok 4.6 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
Grok 4.6 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Grok 4.6 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is — and Grok 4.6 is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or Grok 4.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.