Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-2aa739d957fc · verified_score · leader | 97.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) | 90.5093% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Low) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-b5cb5ec6e8c7 · verified_score · leader | 90.00100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5.1 (XHigh) | 61.2568% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Family | Claude 5 1 | Deepseek V4 Pro |
| Model | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Version | Claude Fable 5.1 | DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-08-13 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2026-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 1.6T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 49B |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Claude Fable 5.1 Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Claude Fable 5Anthropic | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is $10.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5.1 is $50.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Fable 5.1 supports 1,000K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Fable 5.1 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+
Claude Fable 5.1 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Fable 5.1 is 128K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is —.
Do Claude Fable 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
Claude Fable 5.1 has 1 sourced provider route; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.