DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent
At a Glance
| Compare | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.0868Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.1736Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 89.0099% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | 89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 61.3994% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) | 65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,431.7999% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.66110387, 1435.91557810]; votes 48887; rank 83 | 1,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | retired | preview |
| Released | 2026-04-24 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 290.9B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 13B | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.