DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.0868Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026$1.25Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.1736Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026$2.50Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader89.0099% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)89.50100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader61.3994% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)65.14100% of row best · percent · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,431.7999% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.66110387, 1435.91557810]; votes 48887; rank 831,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
DeveloperDeepSeekxAI
FamilyDeepseek V4 FlashGrok 4 20
ModelDeepSeek-V4-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
VersionDeepSeek-V4-FlashGrok 4.20 Multi-Agent
Lifecycleretiredpreview
Released2026-04-24Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters290.9BUnknown
Active parameters13BUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoninggeneration, reasoning, research, tools

DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.20-multi-agent-0309

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Grok 4.20 Multi Agent leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback