DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K3

Market Position

LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIDeepSeekZ.aiMiniMaxOpenAIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.020$0.050$0.100$0.200$0.5006873788287Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingDeepSeek-V4-FlashKimi-K3
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#19 of 2241.8 score#11 of 2271.3 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#2 of 36$0.0060 per LiveBench case#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#1 of 2270.9 score#13 of 2251.7 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-FlashKimi-K3
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-15fb467fd4fc · verified_score · leader89.0094% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)94.50100% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9a3db289984e · verified_score · leader61.39100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)60.4298% of row best · percent · Kimi K3 (Max)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,431.9897% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.84091263, 1436.10937297]; votes 48963; rank 801,476.31100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1470.86166728, 1481.76254962]; votes 17895; rank 16
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader69.6786% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash · 34,434 output tokens / case81.02100% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark win3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
DeepSeek · activeDeepSeek V4 FlashVerified Aug 28, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldDeepSeek-V4-FlashKimi-K3
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot AI
FamilyDeepseek V4 FlashKimi K3
ModelDeepSeek-V4-FlashKimi-K3
VersionDeepSeek-V4-FlashKimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-242026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters290.9B2.8T
Active parameters13B104B
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning

17 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$0.0868
Output price$0.1736
Serving providers5
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Flash is 1,049K and Kimi K3 is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 3 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash and Kimi K3 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash is — and Kimi K3 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, a tie.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback