DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs SOMA X v0.3.0
At a Glance
| Compare |  DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek |  SOMA X v0.3.0NVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.22DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.66DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Soma X |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
| Lifecycle | retired | active |
| Released | 2026-08-21 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Model-specific input |
| Output modalities | Text | 3D |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 304.6B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | animation, hand-modeling, human-body-modeling, motion-retargeting, pose-inversion, simulation |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Capabilities
SOMA X v0.3.0 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | family variantsimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs SOMA X v0.3.0 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and SOMA X v0.3.0, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Only DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has a directly sourced input price: $0.22 per million tokens. Only DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has a directly sourced output price: $0.66 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 1,049K and SOMA X v0.3.0 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is open weight; SOMA X v0.3.0 is open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and SOMA X v0.3.0 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented with image input; SOMA X v0.3.0 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 393K and SOMA X v0.3.0 is —.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and SOMA X v0.3.0 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. SOMA X v0.3.0: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 3 sourced provider routes; SOMA X v0.3.0 has 0, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.