DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GLM 5.3
Market Position
LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost
This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #8 of 36$0.035 per LiveBench case | #28 of 36$0.248 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 79.67100% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp · 52,644 output tokens / case | 79.1599% of row best · percent · glm-5.3 · 62,090 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Family | Deepseek V4 Flash Vision Exp | Glm 5 3 |
| Model | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | GLM-5.3 |
| Version | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp | GLM-5.3 |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | 2026-08-21 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 304.6B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | mit | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | family variantstext |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GLM 5.3 FAQs
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.22 and GLM 5.3 is $1.20 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.66 and GLM 5.3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp supports 1,049K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.
Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GLM 5.3 understand images?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the larger sourced maximum output: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp supports 393K and GLM 5.3 supports 131K output tokens.
Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 3 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so GLM 5.3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GLM 5.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.