DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#7 of 5783.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 55.6–88.9
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort#16 of 27$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9UnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort#6 of 2758.6 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 44.7–61.3
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.22DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026$1.65Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.66DeepSeek ↗ · Sep 2, 2026$4.951Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpQwen3.8-Max
LiveBench2026-06-25-90f8d44da965 · overall · leader79.6797% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp · 52,644 output tokens / case81.88100% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpQwen3.8-Max
DeveloperDeepSeekQwen
FamilyDeepseek V4 Flash Vision ExpQwen3 8 Max
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpQwen3.8-Max
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpQwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleretiredactive
Released2026-08-21Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parameters304.6B2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.22 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.66 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the larger sourced context window. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp supports 1,048,576 tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000,000 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented as self-hostable; Qwen3.8 Max is documented as not self-hostable. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp supports 393,216 tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131,072 tokens.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback