DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K3

Market Position

LiveBench Quality Versus Estimated Output Cost

Full ranking →
Efficiency FrontierLiveBench overall · output estimate
Upper-left is better
xAIDeepSeekZ.aiMiniMaxOpenAIQwenGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AIAnthropic
LiveBench quality versus score-adjusted output costEach dot is a reviewed major-model configuration and is colored by developer. Higher means a better LiveBench overall score. Farther left means lower estimated output cost after adjusting by the score. A dotted line connects the non-dominated frontier observations. When models are selected, their sourced families remain prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and an orange ring identifies each selected model.$0.0050$0.010$0.020$0.050$0.100$0.200$0.5006873788287Grok Build 0.1GLM 5.3 FlashGPT-5.6 Luna (max)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpGPT-5.6 Sol (max)Score-adjusted output cost per LiveBench case (log) →LiveBench overall →
The dotted frontier connects measured, non-dominated major-model observations. With a selection, sourced families stay prominent, unrelated observations retain their developer colors at lower opacity, and orange rings mark the selected model or models. Family lines connect models only when their sourced family and generation match. Cost is estimated from published output tokens and the lowest current USD output rate; it excludes input, caching, batch discounts, and provider-specific benchmark execution details.

This current-market view appears only when both compared models are reviewed current models with publisher-reported LiveBench token accounting and current sourced USD output rates.

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpKimi-K3
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#11 of 2271.3 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#8 of 36$0.035 per LiveBench case#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#13 of 2251.7 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpKimi-K3
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader79.6798% of row best · percent · deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp · 52,644 output tokens / case81.02100% of row best · percent · kimi-k3 · 13,647 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
DeepSeek · previewDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpVerified Sep 2, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpKimi-K3
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot AI
FamilyDeepseek V4 Flash Vision ExpKimi K3
ModelDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpKimi-K3
VersionDeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-ExpKimi-K3
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-08-212026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parameters304.6B2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning

16 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$0.22
Output price$0.66
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.22 and Kimi K3 is $2.85 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is $0.66 and Kimi K3 is $14.25 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 1,049K and Kimi K3 is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K3 understand images?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is 393K and Kimi K3 is —.

Do DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has 3 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback