Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#24 of 4660.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#31 of 44$0.198 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#31 of 3847.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$3.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$15.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader47.6755% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)86.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader4.037% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)60.42100% of row best · percent · Claude Sonnet 4.6 (High)
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,419.9796% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1414.09579972, 1425.83505080]; votes 34677; rank 371,482.24100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1476.36427265, 1488.10617859]; votes 57813; rank 11
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6496% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,458.26100% of row best · rating · claude-sonnet-4-6; 95% CI [1454.67519650, 1461.85096774]; votes 66208; rank 35
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1590% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case83.63100% of row best · points · Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 18,675 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins4 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
DeveloperAnthropicAnthropic
FamilyClaude 4 5Claude 4
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-02-17
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-08-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-sonnet-4-6

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $3.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 is $15.00 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Claude Sonnet 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Claude Sonnet 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 64K and Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports 128K output tokens.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Claude Sonnet 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback