Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5Inkling
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader47.6760% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)79.50100% of row best · percent · Inkling
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader4.0311% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)36.53100% of row best · percent · Inkling
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6497% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,439.68100% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1595% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case79.41100% of row best · points · Inkling · 5,785 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5Inkling
DeveloperAnthropicThinking Machines Lab
FamilyClaude 4 5Inkling
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5Inkling
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5Inkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-07-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown975B
Active parametersUnknown41B
LicenseUnknownapache-2.0
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Inkling FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so Inkling is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so Inkling is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and Inkling supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

Inkling leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Inkling is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and Inkling understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and Inkling is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback