Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3#20 of 4665.0 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#20 of 44$0.094 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#14 of 3857.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$1.30Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$2.60Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-354e4ceb2669 · verified_score · leader47.6753% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)90.50100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Low)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9d422cc0fd9e · verified_score · leader4.037% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)61.25100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6497% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,443.95100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-pro-high-20260813; 95% CI [1437.16050212, 1450.73220317]; votes 9008; rank 58
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1589% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case84.68100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) · 18,462 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaude 4 5Deepseek V4 Pro
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-10-152026-08-13
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown1.6T
Active parametersUnknown49B
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $1.30 per million tokens, so Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $2.60 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has 3, so DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback