Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
At a Glance
| Compare | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.0868Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 | $0.1736Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 200K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader | 47.6754% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K) | 89.00100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader | 4.037% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K) | 61.39100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,396.6498% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 147 | 1,431.79100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.66110387, 1435.91557810]; votes 48887; rank 83 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 75.1596% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case | 78.00100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Flash (xhigh) · 12,709 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 3 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | DeepSeek |
| Family | Claude 4 5 | Deepseek V4 Flash |
| Model | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
| Version | Claude Haiku 4.5 | DeepSeek-V4-Flash |
| Lifecycle | active | retired |
| Released | 2025-10-15 | 2026-04-24 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 200K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 290.9B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 13B |
| License | Unknown | mit |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) | DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, reasoning |
Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities
DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash FAQs
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash be self-hosted?+
DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight.
Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash understand images?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and DeepSeek V4 Flash is —.
Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.