Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#43 of 469.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 6.0–39.3UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.0868Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026$0.1736Openrouter · Aug 28, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens200K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-ba05d69f6453 · verified_score · leader47.6754% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)89.00100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-6c676fa3e9af · verified_score · leader4.037% of row best · percent · Claude Haiku 4.5 (Thinking 32K)61.39100% of row best · percent · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Max)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,396.6498% of row best · rating · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; 95% CI [1394.12644647, 1399.14715328]; votes 129278; rank 1471,431.79100% of row best · rating · deepseek-v4-flash; 95% CI [1427.66110387, 1435.91557810]; votes 48887; rank 83
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified75.1596% of row best · points · Claude Haiku 4.5 · 10,996 output tokens / case78.00100% of row best · points · DeepSeek V4 Flash (xhigh) · 12,709 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins3 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
DeveloperAnthropicDeepSeek
FamilyClaude 4 5Deepseek V4 Flash
ModelClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
VersionClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash
Lifecycleactiveretired
Released2025-10-152026-04-24
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window200K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown290.9B
Active parametersUnknown13B
LicenseUnknownmit
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessAnthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard)DeepSeek (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning

Claude Haiku 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-haiku-4-5

DeepSeek V4 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDdeepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash FAQs

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is $1.00 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.0868 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Claude Haiku 4.5 is $5.00 and DeepSeek V4 Flash is $0.1736 per million tokens, so DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K and DeepSeek V4 Flash supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 3 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash be self-hosted?+

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Claude Haiku 4.5 is not marked open weight; DeepSeek V4 Flash is open weight.

Can Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash understand images?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 is documented with image input; DeepSeek V4 Flash is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Claude Haiku 4.5 is 64K and DeepSeek V4 Flash is —.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek V4 Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

Claude Haiku 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. DeepSeek V4 Flash: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

Claude Haiku 4.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; DeepSeek V4 Flash has 5, so DeepSeek V4 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V4 Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback