Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-4.1
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1verified-v1-15fb467fd4fc · verified_score · leader | 98.50100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (XHigh) | 5.506% of row best · percent · GPT-4.1 |
| ARC-AGI-2verified-v2-9a3db289984e · verified_score · leader | 89.17100% of row best · percent · Claude Fable 5 (Max) | 0.420% of row best · percent · GPT-4.1 |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,494.40100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1489.42750707, 1499.38052801]; votes 26977; rank 5 | 1,382.7193% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1379.00467679, 1386.41941365]; votes 49913; rank 153 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,329.46100% of row best · rating · claude-fable-5; 95% CI [1321.03632319, 1337.88661881]; votes 10002; rank 1 | 1,210.3291% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1203.63813827, 1217.00696914]; votes 41034; rank 70 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 4 benchmark winsOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Openai |
| Family | Claude 5 | Gpt 4 1 |
| Model | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-4.1 |
| Version | Claude Fable 5 | GPT-4.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2024-06-01 |
| Input modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Output modalities | Unknown | Unknown |
| Context window | 1,000,000 | 1,047,576 |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
11 comparable fields · 7 material differences · Interactive comparison only; indexing gate not met
Claude Fable 5 Capabilities
GPT-4.1 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-4.1 FAQs
Is Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Claude Fable 5 and GPT-4.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
Claude Fable 5 is $10.00 and GPT-4.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 is cheaper on this metric. Claude Fable 5 is $50.00 and GPT-4.1 is $4.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
GPT-4.1 has the larger sourced context window. Claude Fable 5 supports 1,000,000 and GPT-4.1 supports 1,047,576.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
Claude Fable 5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Claude Fable 5 is not marked open weight; GPT-4.1 is not marked open weight.
Can Claude Fable 5 and GPT-4.1 understand images?+
Claude Fable 5 is not documented with image input; GPT-4.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
Claude Fable 5 has the larger sourced maximum output: Claude Fable 5 supports 128,000 and GPT-4.1 supports 32,768 output tokens.
Do Claude Fable 5 and GPT-4.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Claude Fable 5: reasoning and tool calling. GPT-4.1: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
Claude Fable 5 has 3 sourced provider routes; GPT-4.1 has 2, so Claude Fable 5 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Claude Fable 5 or GPT-4.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.