SOMA X v0.3.0 vs Bonsai Image Ternary 4B
At a Glance
| Compare | SOMA X v0.3.0NVIDIA | Bonsai Image Ternary 4BPrismML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 18, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | SOMA-X v0.3.0 | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | NVIDIA | PrismML |
| Family | Soma X | Bonsai Image 4b |
| Model | SOMA-X v0.3.0 | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B |
| Version | SOMA-X v0.3.0 | Bonsai Image Ternary 4B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2026-05-21 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Model-specific input | Text |
| Output modalities | 3D | Image |
| Context window | Unknown | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 4B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | No | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Capabilities | animation, hand-modeling, human-body-modeling, motion-retargeting, pose-inversion, simulation | generation |
| Base model | Unknown | FLUX.2 Klein 4B |
| Default resolution | Unknown | 512 × 512 |
| Transformer size | Unknown | 1.21 GB |
| Weight format | Unknown | Ternary weights with FP16 group scales |
SOMA X v0.3.0 Capabilities
Bonsai Image Ternary 4B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
SOMA X v0.3.0 vs Bonsai Image Ternary 4B FAQs
Is SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both SOMA X v0.3.0 and Bonsai Image Ternary 4B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. SOMA X v0.3.0 is — and Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. SOMA X v0.3.0 is open weight; Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is open weight.
Can SOMA X v0.3.0 and Bonsai Image Ternary 4B understand images?+
SOMA X v0.3.0 is not documented with image input; Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. SOMA X v0.3.0 is — and Bonsai Image Ternary 4B is —.
Do SOMA X v0.3.0 and Bonsai Image Ternary 4B support reasoning and tool use?+
SOMA X v0.3.0: none of these features are definitively sourced. Bonsai Image Ternary 4B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
SOMA X v0.3.0 has 0 sourced provider routes; Bonsai Image Ternary 4B has 0, a tie.
Which offers better value, SOMA X v0.3.0 or Bonsai Image Ternary 4B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.