Kimi K3 vs SOMA X v0.3.0
At a Glance
| Compare | Kimi K3Moonshot AI | SOMA X v0.3.0NVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | #17 of 4670.3 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #30 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | #21 of 3852.5 score · 3/3 sources · complete | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.85Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $14.25Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Kimi-K3 | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Family | Kimi K3 | Soma X |
| Model | Kimi-K3 | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
| Version | Kimi-K3 | SOMA-X v0.3.0 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-07-16 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Model-specific input |
| Output modalities | Text | 3D |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 2.8T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 104B | Unknown |
| License | other | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | animation, hand-modeling, human-body-modeling, motion-retargeting, pose-inversion, simulation |
Kimi K3 Capabilities
SOMA X v0.3.0 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Kimi K3 vs SOMA X v0.3.0 FAQs
Is Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and SOMA X v0.3.0, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $2.85 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $14.25 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K3 is 1,049K and SOMA X v0.3.0 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K3 is open weight; SOMA X v0.3.0 is open weight.
Can Kimi K3 and SOMA X v0.3.0 understand images?+
Kimi K3 is documented with image input; SOMA X v0.3.0 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and SOMA X v0.3.0 is —.
Do Kimi K3 and SOMA X v0.3.0 support reasoning and tool use?+
Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. SOMA X v0.3.0: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; SOMA X v0.3.0 has 0, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or SOMA X v0.3.0?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.