Phi-4 Reasoning vs Kimi K3

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingPhi-4-reasoningKimi-K3
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#24 of 36$0.194 per LiveBench case

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Microsoft · activePhi-4 ReasoningVerified Aug 28, 2026
Moonshot AI · activeKimi K3Verified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldPhi-4-reasoningKimi-K3
DeveloperMicrosoftMoonshot AI
FamilyPhi 4 ReasoningKimi K3
ModelPhi-4-reasoningKimi-K3
VersionPhi-4-reasoningKimi-K3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-302026-07-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window33K1,049K
Total parameters14.7B2.8T
Active parametersUnknown104B
Licensemitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning

14 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price$2.85
Output price$14.25
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Phi-4 Reasoning vs Kimi K3 FAQs

Is Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced input price: $2.85 per million tokens. Only Kimi K3 has a directly sourced output price: $14.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K and Kimi K3 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight; Kimi K3 is open weight.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K3 understand images?+

Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input; Kimi K3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Phi-4 Reasoning is — and Kimi K3 is —.

Do Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

Phi-4 Reasoning has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K3 has 5, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback