Phi-4 Reasoning vs Kimi K2.6
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Phi-4-reasoning | Kimi-K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #17 of 36$0.095 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Phi-4-reasoning | Kimi-K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Microsoft | Moonshot AI |
| Family | Phi 4 Reasoning | Kimi K2 6 |
| Model | Phi-4-reasoning | Kimi-K2.6 |
| Version | Phi-4-reasoning | Kimi-K2.6 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2026-04-20 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 14.7B | 1T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 32B |
| License | mit | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities
Kimi K2.6 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext |
Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Phi-4 Reasoning vs Kimi K2.6 FAQs
Is Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K2.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
Only Kimi K2.6 has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.6 has a directly sourced output price: $3.50 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
Kimi K2.6 has the larger sourced context window. Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K and Kimi K2.6 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight; Kimi K2.6 is open weight.
Can Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K2.6 understand images?+
Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input; Kimi K2.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Phi-4 Reasoning is — and Kimi K2.6 is —.
Do Phi-4 Reasoning and Kimi K2.6 support reasoning and tool use?+
Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Kimi K2.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
Phi-4 Reasoning has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K2.6 has 5, so Kimi K2.6 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Phi-4 Reasoning or Kimi K2.6?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.