Phi-4 Reasoning vs GPT-6 Astra

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Microsoft · activePhi-4 ReasoningVerified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-6 AstraVerified Sep 4, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldPhi-4-reasoningGPT-6 Astra
DeveloperMicrosoftOpenAI
FamilyPhi 4 ReasoningGpt 6
ModelPhi-4-reasoningGPT-6 Astra
VersionPhi-4-reasoningGPT-6 Astra
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-302026-09-03
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2026-04-30
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window33K1,050K
Total parameters14.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools

12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

GPT-6 Astra Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Input price$10.00
Output price$50.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-6-astra

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Phi-4 Reasoning vs GPT-6 Astra FAQs

Is Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-6 Astra, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced input price: $10.00 per million tokens. Only GPT-6 Astra has a directly sourced output price: $50.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

GPT-6 Astra has the larger sourced context window. Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K and GPT-6 Astra supports 1,050K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra be self-hosted?+

Phi-4 Reasoning is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight; GPT-6 Astra is not marked open weight.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-6 Astra understand images?+

Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input; GPT-6 Astra is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Phi-4 Reasoning is — and GPT-6 Astra is 128K.

Do Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-6 Astra support reasoning and tool use?+

Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. GPT-6 Astra: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

Phi-4 Reasoning has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-6 Astra has 1, so GPT-6 Astra has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-6 Astra?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback