Phi-4 Reasoning vs GPT-4o

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Microsoft · activePhi-4 ReasoningVerified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-4oVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldPhi-4-reasoningGPT-4o
DeveloperMicrosoftOpenAI
FamilyPhi 4 ReasoningGpt 4o
ModelPhi-4-reasoningGPT-4o
VersionPhi-4-reasoningGPT-4o
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-30Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2023-10-01
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window33K128K
Total parameters14.7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicensemitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, tools

11 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

GPT-4o Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price$1.25
Output price$5.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-4o

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Phi-4 Reasoning vs GPT-4o FAQs

Is Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-4o, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

Only GPT-4o has a directly sourced input price: $1.25 per million tokens. Only GPT-4o has a directly sourced output price: $5.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

GPT-4o has the larger sourced context window. Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K and GPT-4o supports 128K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o be self-hosted?+

Phi-4 Reasoning is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight; GPT-4o is not marked open weight.

Can Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-4o understand images?+

Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input; GPT-4o is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Phi-4 Reasoning is — and GPT-4o is 16K.

Do Phi-4 Reasoning and GPT-4o support reasoning and tool use?+

Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. GPT-4o: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

Phi-4 Reasoning has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-4o has 2, so GPT-4o has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Phi-4 Reasoning or GPT-4o?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback