PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
At a Glance
| Compare |  PaddleOCR VL 1.5Baidu |  Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Paddleocr VL 1 5 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Version | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-01-29 | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 958.6M | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | automated-patching, cybersecurity, reasoning, vulnerability-detection |
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 Capabilities
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber FAQs
Is PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is 131K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber be self-hosted?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is open weight; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not marked open weight.
Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber understand images?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is documented with image input; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is — and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Do PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber support reasoning and tool use?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5: image input. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 has 0 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber has 0, a tie.
Which offers better value, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.