PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs ERNIE X1.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  PaddleOCR VL 1.5Baidu | ERNIE X1.1Baidu |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 131K | 66K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Baidu | Baidu |
| Family | Paddleocr VL 1 5 | Ernie X1 |
| Model | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
| Version | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 | ERNIE X1.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-01-29 | 2025-09-26 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | 66K |
| Total parameters | 958.6M | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Baidu Qianfan (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation | agents, chat, reasoning, search, tools |
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 Capabilities
ERNIE X1.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text |
PaddleOCR-VL-1.5Baidu | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 vs ERNIE X1.1 FAQs
Is PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE X1.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only ERNIE X1.1 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 has the larger sourced context window. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 supports 131K and ERNIE X1.1 supports 66K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1 be self-hosted?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is open weight; ERNIE X1.1 is not marked open weight.
Can PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE X1.1 understand images?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is documented with image input; ERNIE X1.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. PaddleOCR VL 1.5 is — and ERNIE X1.1 is 66K.
Do PaddleOCR VL 1.5 and ERNIE X1.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5: image input. ERNIE X1.1: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
PaddleOCR VL 1.5 has 0 sourced provider routes; ERNIE X1.1 has 1, so ERNIE X1.1 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, PaddleOCR VL 1.5 or ERNIE X1.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.