OpenVLA 7B vs Grok 4.7

At a Glance

Compare
OpenVLA 7BOpenVLA Research Team
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported500K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 22, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldOpenVLA 7BGrok 4.7
DeveloperOpenVLA Research TeamxAI
FamilyOpenVLAGrok 4
ModelOpenVLA 7BGrok 4.7
Version7BGrok 4.7
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-06-132026-09-21
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Robot stateText, Image
Output modalitiesRobot actionText
Context windowUnknown500K
Total parameters7BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableNoYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownXai (Standard)
Capabilitiescross-embodiment, fine-tuning, generalist-manipulationchat, generation, reasoning, tools
Robotics model typeVision-language-action modelUnknown
Action representationTokenized actions decoded to continuous robot controlsUnknown
Control architectureFused SigLIP and DINOv2 visual encoder with Llama 2 7B backboneUnknown
Inference locationFlexibleUnknown
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsWidowX, Google Robot, Franka PandaUnknown
Training data970,000 robot manipulation trajectories from Open X-Embodiment described by the authors.Unknown

OpenVLA 7B Capabilities

cross-embodimentfine-tuninggeneralist-manipulation
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceFlexible
Action representationTokenized actions decoded to continuous robot controls
Supported embodiments3
Canonical IDopenvla/openvla-7b

Grok 4.7 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.7

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

OpenVLA 7B vs Grok 4.7 FAQs

Is OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both OpenVLA 7B and Grok 4.7, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

Only Grok 4.7 has a directly sourced input price: $2.00 per million tokens. Only Grok 4.7 has a directly sourced output price: $6.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. OpenVLA 7B is — and Grok 4.7 is 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7 be self-hosted?+

OpenVLA 7B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. OpenVLA 7B is open weight; Grok 4.7 is not marked open weight.

Can OpenVLA 7B and Grok 4.7 understand images?+

OpenVLA 7B is documented with image input; Grok 4.7 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. OpenVLA 7B is — and Grok 4.7 is —.

Do OpenVLA 7B and Grok 4.7 support reasoning and tool use?+

OpenVLA 7B: image input. Grok 4.7: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

OpenVLA 7B has 0 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.7 has 1, so Grok 4.7 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, OpenVLA 7B or Grok 4.7?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback