NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B

Why this pair: NVIDIA 30B-A3B Nemotron models across Lightning and Nano families

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,348.42100% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.96803096, 1353.87681829]; votes 15338; rank 1911,331.8499% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b-nvfp4; 95% CI [1322.39322537, 1341.28358716]; votes 4533; rank 207
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
NVIDIA · activeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16Verified Aug 28, 2026
NVIDIA · activeNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3BVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

CuratedIndexable
FieldNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperNVIDIANVIDIA
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-152026-08-11
Knowledge cutoff2025-11-28Unknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262,1441,048,576
Total parameters31,577,937,34430,000,000,000
Active parameters3,500,000,0003,000,000,000
Licenseotheropenmdw-1.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools

16 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Editorially curated pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.050
Output price$0.20
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B FAQs

Is NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

Only NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 has a directly sourced input price: $0.050 per million tokens. Only NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 has a directly sourced output price: $0.20 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 supports 262,144 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B supports 1,048,576.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B is open weight.

Can NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B understand images?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 is 1,048,576 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B is —.

Do NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16: reasoning and tool calling. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B has 1, so NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback