Olmo 3 32B Think vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16
At a Glance
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | #43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7 | #43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.15Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $0.050Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.50Openrouter ↗ · Aug 28, 2026 | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Olmo-3-32B-Think | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,299.4296% of row best · rating · olmo-3-32b-think; 95% CI [1291.17882644, 1307.65677276]; votes 5831; rank 248 | 1,347.82100% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.43511795, 1353.20837526]; votes 15770; rank 209 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Olmo-3-32B-Think | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | NVIDIA |
| Family | Olmo 3 32b Think | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16 |
| Model | Olmo-3-32B-Think | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
| Version | Olmo-3-32B-Think | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2025-12-15 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2025-11-28 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 32.2B | 31.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 3.5B |
| License | apache-2.0 | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Openrouter (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Olmo 3 32B Think Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs | cross-developer peerstext | ||
| vs |  Phi-4-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs |  DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Phi-4-mini-reasoningMicrosoft | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Codestral-22B-v0.1Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  gpt-oss-20bOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Olmo 3 32B Think vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 FAQs
Is Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Olmo 3 32B Think and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
Olmo 3 32B Think is $0.15 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Olmo 3 32B Think is $0.50 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced context window. Olmo 3 32B Think supports 65,536 tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262,144 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Olmo 3 32B Think is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight.
Can Olmo 3 32B Think and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 understand images?+
Olmo 3 32B Think is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output. Olmo 3 32B Think supports 32,768 tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 1,048,576 tokens.
Do Olmo 3 32B Think and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+
Olmo 3 32B Think: reasoning. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
Olmo 3 32B Think has 1 sourced provider route; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Olmo 3 32B Think or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.