Qwen3.8 27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4#23 of 5752.2 score · 3/3 sources · complete#43 of 570.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 0.0–66.7
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#12 of 27$0.063 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.9#17 of 2747.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 27-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.20Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$0.050Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.20Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026$0.20Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkQwen3.8-27BNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader1,440.55100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-27b; 95% CI [1435.47949951, 1445.61514077]; votes 23294; rank 751,347.8294% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.43511795, 1353.20837526]; votes 15770; rank 209
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldQwen3.8-27BNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
DeveloperQwenNVIDIA
FamilyQwen3 8 27bNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16
ModelQwen3.8-27BNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
VersionQwen3.8-27BNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-12-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-11-28
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters27.8B31.6B
Active parametersUnknown3.5B
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Qwen3.8 27B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDQwen/Qwen3.8-27B

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Qwen3.8 27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 FAQs

Is Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Qwen3.8 27B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Qwen3.8 27B is $0.20 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Qwen3.8 27B is $2.20 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 262,144 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Qwen3.8 27B is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight.

Can Qwen3.8 27B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 understand images?+

Qwen3.8 27B is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output. Qwen3.8 27B supports 131,072 tokens and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 1,048,576 tokens.

Do Qwen3.8 27B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

Qwen3.8 27B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Qwen3.8 27B has 3 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3, a tie.

Which offers better value, Qwen3.8 27B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback