NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent
At a Glance
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #22 of 4663.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 42.3–75.6 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.050Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $1.25Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.20Openrouter ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $2.50Xai ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,000K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,348.4493% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 195 | 1,449.94100% of row best · rating · grok-4.20-multi-agent-beta-0309; 95% CI [1446.16660741, 1453.71198087]; votes 60777; rank 46 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | NVIDIA | xAI |
| Family | Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16 | Grok 4 20 |
| Model | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Version | NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16 | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2025-12-15 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-11-28 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | 31.6B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 3.5B | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Xai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | generation, reasoning, research, tools |
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 vs Grok 4.20 Multi Agent FAQs
Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $1.25 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is $2.50 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent be self-hosted?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is not marked open weight.
Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent understand images?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is 1,049K and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent is —.
Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 and Grok 4.20 Multi Agent support reasoning and tool use?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Grok 4.20 Multi Agent: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.20 Multi Agent has 1, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 or Grok 4.20 Multi Agent?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.