Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K3Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#17 of 4670.3 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#30 of 44$0.194 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#21 of 3852.5 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.85Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$0.050Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$14.25Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$0.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi-K3NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,472.27100% of row best · rating · kimi-k3-max; 95% CI [1467.05577758, 1477.48944277]; votes 20987; rank 231,348.4492% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b-bf16; 95% CI [1342.98546755, 1353.88978012]; votes 15325; rank 195
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi-K3NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA
FamilyKimi K3Nvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Bf16
ModelKimi-K3NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
VersionKimi-K3NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-07-162025-12-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2025-11-28
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K262K
Total parameters2.8T31.6B
Active parameters104B3.5B
Licenseotherother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoningchat, generation, reasoning, tools

Kimi K3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K3

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 FAQs

Is Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Kimi K3 is $2.85 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.050 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K3 is $14.25 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is $0.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Kimi K3 has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K3 supports 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K3 is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is open weight.

Can Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 understand images?+

Kimi K3 is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K3 is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 is 1,049K.

Do Kimi K3 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K3: reasoning and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

Kimi K3 has 5 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16 has 3, so Kimi K3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K3 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback