Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K2.6

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#32 of 4650.5 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 33.6–67.0
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#21 of 44$0.095 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#24 of 3850.1 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.7–58.4
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.75Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$3.50Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported262K
Model facts checkedSep 4, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K2.6
LMArena Document Arenadocument-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,470.66100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1452.36505006, 1488.94793707]; votes 1006; rank 151,450.7499% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.6; 95% CI [1443.10467262, 1458.37474735]; votes 11291; rank 27
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,489.74100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1480.91456937, 1498.56660928]; votes 4723; rank 101,454.9298% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.6; 95% CI [1450.40277919, 1459.43693683]; votes 37502; rank 38
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,314.56100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.3-max; 95% CI [1299.74034111, 1329.38210317]; votes 1804; rank 81,280.4097% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.6; 95% CI [1273.38025179, 1287.42397051]; votes 15347; rank 28
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader85.47100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.3-xhigh · 28,234 output tokens / case74.1887% of row best · percent · kimi-k2.6-thinking · 27,001 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified82.63100% of row best · points · Muse Spark 1.3 (thinking) · 6,301 output tokens / case82.24100% of row best · points · Kimi K2.6 (thinking) · 18,080 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie3 benchmark winsOverall lead0 benchmark wins

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K2.6
DeveloperMetaMoonshot AI
FamilyMuse SparkKimi K2 6
ModelMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K2.6
VersionMuse Spark 1.3Kimi-K2.6
Lifecyclepreviewactive
Released2026-09-022026-04-20
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context windowUnknown262K
Total parametersUnknown1T
Active parametersUnknown32B
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Muse Spark 1.3 Capabilities

chatcomputer-usegenerationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmeta-llama/muse-spark-1.3

Kimi K2.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.6

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K2.6 FAQs

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K2.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

Only Kimi K2.6 has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.6 has a directly sourced output price: $3.50 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Kimi K2.6 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 4 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6 be self-hosted?+

Kimi K2.6 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Muse Spark 1.3 is not marked open weight; Kimi K2.6 is open weight.

Can Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K2.6 understand images?+

Muse Spark 1.3 is documented with image input; Kimi K2.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Kimi K2.6 is —.

Do Muse Spark 1.3 and Kimi K2.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

Muse Spark 1.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K2.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

Muse Spark 1.3 has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K2.6 has 5, so Kimi K2.6 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.3 or Kimi K2.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback