Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader | 85.47100% of row best · percent · muse-spark-1.3-xhigh · 28,234 output tokens / case | 81.8896% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Qwen |
| Family | Muse Spark | Qwen3 8 Max |
| Model | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Version | Muse Spark 1.3 | Qwen3.8-Max |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Text, Image, Video |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 2.4T |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Unknown | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
11 comparable fields · 6 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Muse Spark 1.3 Capabilities
Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | cross-developer peerstext |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Muse Spark 1.3Meta | vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | Muse Spark 1.3Meta | developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs
Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced input price: $1.65 per million tokens. Only Qwen3.8 Max has a directly sourced output price: $4.951 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Muse Spark 1.3 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.
Can Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+
Muse Spark 1.3 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Muse Spark 1.3 is — and Qwen3.8 Max is 131K.
Do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+
Muse Spark 1.3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
Muse Spark 1.3 has 0 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.8 Max?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.